Re:Show HN: TinyClock – a tiny true 5-arch universal Mac OS ...
by Karellen on Wednesday September 07, 2022 @02:36PM
(#32754477)
Because sending different content based on the content-type the user-agent asks for, e.g. with the "Accept:" header, has explicitly been part of the HTTP spec since version 1.1 in 1997?
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2068#section-12
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2068#section-14.1
See also https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Content_ne...
(FWIW - I don't know if that's how `bzr` does this, but it might, and the concept is 25 years old now.)
Edit: s/different content/different representations of the same resource/
Re:Show HN: TinyClock – a tiny true 5-arch universal Mac OS ...
by unwind on Wednesday September 07, 2022 @03:23PM
(#32755354)
True of course, didn't think about that. I'm not a web developer. :) Still think it's weird and kind of against my feeling for the spirit of a URI, but that's just me. Thanks.
When coming from git/Mercurial/subversion etc as I do, it is at least mildly weird that the Bazaar repo address is the same as the address of a web document. The two objects are not (at least in my world) the same, so why should they share URIs?
Edit: deduped.