News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:On the efficacy of online proctoring using Proctorio (202... by sandworm101 on Tuesday September 06, 2022 @10:31PM (#32745717)
>> which can then be re-encoded to not have protection

There are actually a handful of technologies meant to survive the transcription process only to reappear in the new medium. Probably the most effective schemes are used in money, in paper bills. There are little things there (ie the eurion constellation) that are purposely designed to be scanned. They can be copied. But then they are detected by software (Adobe Photoshop) and hardware (high-end printers) which then refuse to edit or reprint them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EURion_constellation

Other tech is meant to leave a trail leading back to forgers, a bit like a DVD ripping software embedding your MAC/IP information in any Mp3 it generates.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_Identification_Code

Re:On the efficacy of online proctoring using Proctorio (202... by jabbany on Wednesday September 07, 2022 @12:32AM (#32746336)
Persistent marks as copy protection doesn't work for media mainly because they deal with the consumption rather than copying side, so just one single non-compliant legacy device spoils the entire thing.

As for fingerprinting, that's a whole 'nother can of worms. I've never seen it be used for DRM specifically but it has been successfully used many times to track down who was leaking trade secrets etc. In fact it might be more widely deployed than most people realize.

The problem with fingerprinting for DRM would be the plausible deniability of an unsuspecting user "getting hacked" and then their fingerprinted copy ending up as the illegally distributed one without their knowledge or control.

Re:On the efficacy of online proctoring using Proctorio (202... by MichaelCollins on Wednesday September 07, 2022 @04:48AM (#32748176)
The movie industry uses something like 'fingerprinting for DRM', adding dots to film prints sent to movie theaters to figure out where bootleg telecining is being done: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coded_anti-piracy
Re:On the efficacy of online proctoring using Proctorio (202... by jabbany on Wednesday September 07, 2022 @02:34PM (#32754426)
Does it help though? I feel like bootleg recording hasn't really been affected much...
Re:On the efficacy of online proctoring using Proctorio (202... by cowtools on Tuesday September 06, 2022 @10:56PM (#32745868)
I suppose, as long as you use locked down software and hardware. But you will be usually be able to reverse-engineer whatever heuristic they use.

>Other tech is meant to leave a trail leading back to forgers, a bit like a DVD ripping software embedding your MAC/IP information in any Mp3 it generates.

It is simple: rip the media multiple times with different identifying information, and then analyze the diffs (or just take the average). You cannot hide the existence of steganographic data if there are multiple copies with different steganographic data. It is not like analog where a loss of precision is justifiable