It’s a question poorly suited for artistic exploration when the artist defines the outcomes.

The conversation isn’t over when the credits roll, rather that is the end of the beginning.

The issues is narrative isn’t bound by causality making such conversation hollow.

Hardly, talking about how some narrative is hollow and what would have actually happened is a fruitful source of lit papers. The source material is merely the beginning of that conversation, as you and I are literally demonstrating in this thread.

I don’t see how the actual story applies to this discussion as I haven’t seen it. I actually came here to see if it was worth watching.