Re:How I Became a Programmer in ~12 Weeks
by cmagahern on Wednesday November 23, 2011 @11:14PM
(#3273034)
I don't think he was trying to be insulting. From what I gather, he was trying to justify the negativity theme in the comments for this post, which was the subject of the original comment. I agree that the blog post was not detailed enough, and didn't talk enough about HOW you became a programmer in 12 weeks.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:How I Became a Programmer in ~12 Weeks
by mattdeboard on Wednesday November 23, 2011 @11:19PM
(#3273052)
What kind of information do you mean? I programmed, asked questions, programmed, read source code, and programmed. There's zero magic. I learned in the same way all human beings learn.
We're knowledge workers. I gained enough programming knowledge to be a programmer. Where's the confusion?
Re:How I Became a Programmer in ~12 Weeks
by kristiandupont on Thursday November 24, 2011 @10:54AM
(#3274628)
Being a programmer myself, this is a bit theoretical but I think if I wasn't and I sat down to read an article names "How I became a Programmer", I would expect a couple of pointers to where to start, what to do and how to do it.
Besides from the point about learning a language rather than a framework, your post mostly says "It took me 12 week to learn programming" and that the way to do it is the obvious: read stuff, try stuff etc.
There is nothing wrong with this of course, but given the headline, especially here on HN, I can see why some might feel that they didn't quite get their money's worth.
Re:How I Became a Programmer in ~12 Weeks
by mattdeboard on Thursday November 24, 2011 @04:36PM
(#3275467)
Judging by the huge volume of emails and comments on the blog, retweets and all that good stuff the article generated, I feel pretty good about the article
Re:How I Became a Programmer in ~12 Weeks
by yelsgib on Thursday November 24, 2011 @01:02AM
(#3273332)
Where's the content?
Re:How I Became a Programmer in ~12 Weeks
by bretthoerner on Thursday November 24, 2011 @07:59AM
(#3274170)
Did you read the article?