Apple AMX instruction set (M1/M2 matrix coprocessor)

Re:Apple AMX instruction set (M1/M2 matrix coprocessor) by scarface74 on Monday September 05, 2022 @02:35PM (#32727618)

Or on the other hand iMessages is far better than SMS and RCS.

Then you have Google who alone introduced three incompatible messaging apps in one year. It must be part of the promotion process for Google SWEs and PMs to introduce a new messaging app.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple AMX instruction set (M1/M2 matrix coprocessor) by tchaffee on Monday September 05, 2022 @08:19PM (#32731042)

> Or on the other hand iMessages is far better

I have a friend in Brazil is barely surviving as a farmer and has a tiny budget for a phone. He needs messaging. Which is better for him? iMessages or SMS?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple AMX instruction set (M1/M2 matrix coprocessor) by umanwizard on Tuesday September 06, 2022 @02:08AM (#32733500)

Neither actually. The answer for his particular situation is almost certainly WhatsApp.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple AMX instruction set (M1/M2 matrix coprocessor) by tchaffee on Tuesday September 06, 2022 @07:35AM (#32735666)

Not quite. He needs to communicate with everyone, even folks who don't have WhatsApp installed. Not many of them, but they do exist in Brazil.

Either way, it's not going to be an expensive iPhone with iMessages is it?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple AMX instruction set (M1/M2 matrix coprocessor) by umanwizard on Tuesday September 06, 2022 @04:33PM (#32742830)

Probably not, but what's your point? Nobody was arguing that Apple phones are _cheaper_ than Android ones, nor that they're more popular in Brazil

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple AMX instruction set (M1/M2 matrix coprocessor) by tchaffee on Friday September 09, 2022 @07:44AM (#32777991)

My point is that iMessages is not "better". It depends on the use case, and cost is sometimes a factor in deciding which solution is the "best".

[ Parent | on HN ]