News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The quantum computing bubble. Parent comment

Re:The quantum computing bubble by robertlagrant on Monday September 05, 2022 @06:57AM (#32722919)
I've thought about this before, but notating as a structure that needs logical supports instead of a graph.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The quantum computing bubble by brutusborn on Monday September 05, 2022 @07:10AM (#32723014)
When you say logical supports, do you mean something like "A because B and C"? Why is this better than a graph?

If you can't tell I don't know much about formal logic. Apologies for the naive questions.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The quantum computing bubble by robertlagrant on Monday September 05, 2022 @08:32AM (#32723560)
I'm not saying it's better. I'm saying I've thought of a similar idea but with a different notation.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The quantum computing bubble by brutusborn on Monday September 05, 2022 @08:47AM (#32723684)
I didn't mean to come across as argumentative, I was just looking for more details so I could understand better.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The quantum computing bubble by robertlagrant on Monday September 05, 2022 @01:58PM (#32727150)
Oh, you didn't. I did. Sorry - mind on other things!
[ Parent | on HN ]