Re:Ask HN: Location based pay is killing my motivation, how ...
by jogu on Sunday September 04, 2022 @09:11PM
(#32719442)
Just a small nit but I think you mixed up OP (Original Poster) and GP (Grand Parent).
Re:Ask HN: Location based pay is killing my motivation, how ...
by jlkuester7 on Sunday September 04, 2022 @09:44PM
(#32719629)
Hah! I was just wondering if maybe my understanding of those terms was incorrect... Thanks for confirming that I am not going crazy (in that way, at least)!
Re:Ask HN: Location based pay is killing my motivation, how ...
by jlkuester7 on Sunday September 04, 2022 @09:42PM
(#32719621)
All in all, I agree with what you are saying.
I would just like to add that I have found myself extremely happy working for a company of ~100 people (especially when compared with my previous company of ~30,000).
OP is also correct in that the following is how HR at almost every large company thinks about comp:
1. Comp is usually not set by a Hiring Manager and is specifically based on "comparable" which is based on job type and location.
2. Job type and location is by far the easiest way to create a heuristic for pay rates because the data is public
It's basically impossible to individually value everyone's contribution consistently and without bias across hundreds or thousands of employees - plus I don't think people would want to actually be judged with any method that puts granular measurement on something as vague as "value"
So if you can come up with a better way to determine pay *at scale* other than the open market approach, I'm super interested.
The only way to do this in my mind is to never pass -- lets say -- 100 employees.