It’s also in Cloudflare’s very own terms of service that KF agreed to when they signed up
There also seems to be a double standard where dropkiwifarms.net has a link to a google drive that seems to be somewhat similar to the content that might appear on a lolcow thread and could be interpreted as 'doxxing'. For example it has a copy of Joshua Moon's resume and a legal document showing his name change.
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1-sFPWY4HXOxvIUzkyyHV...
“…You intended to cause that person to reasonably fear for their or their family’s safety.” [1]
Regardless, federally in the US, doxxing can be considered a form of harassment, which is generally illegal.
[1] https://www.aerlawgroup.com/blog/fact-or-fiction-doxing-some...
I would argue California DoJ set the example that even releasing personal information in what appears as retaliation to an event seems to be lawful in their eyes. When California DoJ started doxxing they did it right after Bruen Supreme Court case was released.... but hey I can't prove their intent.
A business terminating their relationship with a problematic customer is not "vigilantism".
> That’s a failure of the rule of law on two dimensions: we shouldn’t be the ones making that call, and no one else who should was stepping up in spite of being aware of the threat.
This is the logic of vigilantes. I'm not saying what you have done is on the same level as vigilante murder or anything, but don't try to justify it as something high-and-mighty. You've once again terminated a customer on a whim. And that's your right, but stop trying to make this out to be anything more than that.