Re:IMDB deleted all negative user reviews for The Rings of P...
by LawTalkingGuy on Saturday September 03, 2022 @01:11PM
(#32703880)
I think it was a warranted bias. Obviously in the show's past there was a time when predators predated, or they wouldn't have brought it up.
That makes it more noble. The Rabbit is not just getting over a silly uninformed prejudice, but is willing to intellectually set aside the ongoing murder of her ancestors to fully analyze a case. "Sure, they are naturally violent and we all know that, but is that enough to account for ..." She's a real investigator who refuses to be distracted.
Re:IMDB deleted all negative user reviews for The Rings of P...
by spywaregorilla on Tuesday September 06, 2022 @11:58AM
(#32738936)
The movie was very clear that predators in this universe were not naturally violent.
It's at best on par with prejudice towards people from a country that previously invaded your own.
Act 1 is rabbit cop overcoming assumptions that she cannot be a cop because she is a rabbit.
Act 2 is they catch a savage predator and then, when prompted on the news, rabbit cop suggests it may be due to predators having savage behaviors "in their genetics"
Act 3 is realizing that this was an unwarranted bias, working together, and finding the real culprit.
It's a great progressive film because one of the big racial conflict moments is the rabbit cop, a kind and well intentioned protagonist, grappling with her own subconscious biases.