News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Improper Nouns by skybrian on Friday September 02, 2022 @11:45AM (#32692132)
Another, related phenomenon is when scientists confuse themselves into believing that what they’re studying and a common noun are the same thing. For example, the Big Five traits or whatever “happiness” means in happiness surveys. Labeling an axis with a common noun doesn’t make it coincide with the common meaning, but it ensures it will be confused with it.

This is why scientific names for species are useful. Too bad that practice isn’t used more in other sciences.

More about the problems with surveys: https://carcinisation.com/2020/12/11/survey-chicken/

Re:Improper Nouns by garmain on Friday September 02, 2022 @01:09PM (#32693184)
Yes, having studied psychology and neuroscience I get often frustrated how seemingly normal words take on highly specific and often contrasting meanings.

Reading article after article and realising that every author uses "attention', "perception", "motivation" in slightly shifted ways. In principle it makes sense that increased specificity is needed in a particular field. But when the meaning shifts meaningfully between author working on, ostensibly, the same topic the confusion is immense. I have no clue how to tackle this issue.

Re:Improper Nouns by RajT88 on Friday September 02, 2022 @12:34PM (#32692763)
Yes because scientific names use a dead language and as such has no connotation baggage attached to words.