News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Responding to recruiter emails with GPT-3 by Justsignedup on Friday September 02, 2022 @12:40AM (#32686662)
As one article taught me about over a year ago respond by sending a well formulated email requesting the salary and job offering. Sometimes it leads to you understanding the market. Sometimes it leads to negotiation for higher salary. Sometimes an amazing new job.

So far this has never failed me. And is far better than ignoring. I only really ignore the crypto companies.

Re:Responding to recruiter emails with GPT-3 by iliekcomputers on Friday September 02, 2022 @02:09AM (#32687161)
Also, what this does is really separates the wheat from the chaff. If the company can't tell me the salary or the job, it's not a good fit anyways.

Interestingly, what this means is that Google is not a good fit at all. They wanted me to talk to a sourcer, who would connect me to a recruiter. That's too much corporate foreplay for me, especially without even knowing what team I'd be joining.

Re:Responding to recruiter emails with GPT-3 by brtkdotse on Friday September 02, 2022 @04:35AM (#32688206)
> corporate foreplay

Hello, new vocabulary entry!

Re:Responding to recruiter emails with GPT-3 by hammyhavoc on Friday September 02, 2022 @09:01PM (#32697498)
Maybe they'll even buy you a lobster dinner before they fuck you.
Re:Responding to recruiter emails with GPT-3 by Justsignedup on Saturday September 03, 2022 @12:18AM (#32698673)
While I agree, its also a way to

a) know the market

b) not interview for 4-8 hours only to find out they are going to pay you 30k less than your current job (yep had that, never make that mistake again)

Re:Responding to recruiter emails with GPT-3 by r3trohack3r on Friday September 02, 2022 @01:18AM (#32686867)
I really like this advice! Do you have a link to the article? Would like to learn what you mean by "well formulated."
Re:Responding to recruiter emails with GPT-3 by iacvlvs on Friday September 02, 2022 @03:36AM (#32687773)
Re:Responding to recruiter emails with GPT-3 by soneca on Friday September 02, 2022 @07:02AM (#32689197)
I wonder if it being so long is part of the filtering process. Only good recruiters will read the whole thing and bother to reply.

I personally believe it is unnecessarily long, formal, and diplomatic. It does not fit who I am and, if I were to read it, I would have the impression of an annoying and insincere corporate speak.

I believe I can achieve all the goals of being polite, respectful, considerate, and filtering for serious offers with a much, much shorter and informal response.

Something like:

Hi X, thanks for the contact. Company Y sounds interesting and I do think I might be a good fit for the role. I am not actively looking for a new position now, but i’d like to know more about the job description and compensation details. Thanks!

This should all be sincere if course. If the company does not sound interesting (like all crypto for me), I only reply a respectful “no” ( ”Thank you for the contact, but I am not looking for a new job right now.” ). Similar when job is for roles that I have no experience whatsoever, which often happens. In this case I also mention that I am not a, e.g., Android engineer (I am a web frontend).

Also, if there is no company or role mentioned, I give the first reply, but obviously removing the acknowledgment that I like the company/role and ask for details about it too.