Re:USB 4 version 2 promises 80 Gbps speeds over existing cables
by patrec on Thursday September 01, 2022 @11:48PM
(#32686374)
These numbers make no sense to me. If you typically have 1900% gross profit margins on USB cables, why isn't everyone making USB cables?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:USB 4 version 2 promises 80 Gbps speeds over existing cables
by rcxdude on Friday September 02, 2022 @06:24AM
(#32688975)
This isn't a super unusual markup. There's a huge amount of other costs which bring the overall margin down (e.g. even if you just looked at the markup retailers use you'd think everyone should be in retail or trying to bypass them, until you look into the cost of warehousing, warranty returns, unsold product, 'shrinkage', etc).
Re:USB 4 version 2 promises 80 Gbps speeds over existing cables
by rexf on Friday September 02, 2022 @01:52AM
(#32687072)
There are countless companies making USB/similar cables. They are a commodity and it's hard for them to stand out.
So I use brand (Anker, amazon basics, Apple, etc) and store (amazon.com, best buy, target, etc) to narrow down the countless cable options.
Re:USB 4 version 2 promises 80 Gbps speeds over existing cables
by unnah on Friday September 02, 2022 @03:29AM
(#32687705)
Those numbers are marginal costs only, the manufacturers also have substantial fixed costs. Anyhow, there already are lots and lots of USB cable brands, although I suppose many of them are just rebranding bulk cable products.