News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on SQLite: Past, Present, and Future. Parent comment

Re:SQLite: Past, Present, and Future by ledgerdev on Thursday September 01, 2022 @03:03PM (#32681391)
If it's good enough for avionics and nuclear subs, it's probably good enough for most web apps.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:SQLite: Past, Present, and Future by endisneigh on Thursday September 01, 2022 @04:14PM (#32682442)
Web apps do more concurrent writes than subs, plus you can configure SQLite for more durability
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:SQLite: Past, Present, and Future by sph on Thursday September 01, 2022 @05:08PM (#32683217)
I don't have the data for subs, but there's web app and web app. No one is talking about using SQLite for 5k queries/s.

It might work, but I reckon 90% of web applications live beneath this relatively small threshold and 80% probably don't even reach 50 q/s.

[ Parent | on HN ]