News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Doom 3 source released by frou_dh on Tuesday November 22, 2011 @06:59PM (#3268033)
EDIT: Deleted my GP post to stem conflict.

What I meant (probably poorly phrased) is that for readability for personal study (like gcv was asking about), I think it's worth stripping huge license preambles from source files. There's obviously good legal reason for them being present to start with.

Re:Doom 3 source released by jerf on Tuesday November 22, 2011 @08:00PM (#3268225)
You're a quick couple of shell commands away from stripping them off yourself, if it's that big a deal.