Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach
by philippejara on Wednesday August 31, 2022 @05:10PM
(#32668389)
At that point why bother with cloudflare? if you have a credible legal case to take down the hosting of the website you make a legal case in the place where it is being hosted and use that to get it down. I can't really see any reason for a court of law to force cloudflare to not service someone given that the obvious implications that the one asking for that to happen wants to commit a felony, or at the very least make the target susceptible to one, assuming cloudflare isn't hosting anything of course.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach
by viraptor on Wednesday August 31, 2022 @06:39PM
(#32669258)
Because the hosting company may be not bothered and actively supporting the extremist content. (guess if this applies in this case...)
Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach
by philippejara on Thursday September 01, 2022 @08:06AM
(#32675202)
The hosting company views are completely irrelevant once they receive a legal order to stop hosting something.