Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach

Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach by naasking on Wednesday August 31, 2022 @03:22PM (#32667063)

Are you suggesting that not removing those posts is tacit agreement with their content rather than a principled stance on free speech for it's members? It could be both of course, but I always err on the side of charity even if you don't think they deserve it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach by CJefferson on Wednesday August 31, 2022 @04:42PM (#32668082)

It is support -- kiwifarms isn't a free-for-all, they have their list of "lolcows" (people who have a thread dedicated to them), and only moderators can add new threads.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach by naasking on Wednesday August 31, 2022 @05:00PM (#32668294)

So only moderators can add new threads, and I assume users can post in threads, and I assume the users are the ones posting that the people should kill themselves. So how does this translate into the moderators or site operators/owners endorsing the content of user posts?

Edit: to be clear, "allowing content" does not entail "endorsing content" per my original reply.

[ Parent | on HN ]