News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach by phillipcarter on Wednesday August 31, 2022 @11:43AM (#32663722)
Cloudflare. It's in the TOS. They're not a utility, so yes, they get to decide.
Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach by judge2020 on Wednesday August 31, 2022 @11:48AM (#32663800)
Ok then: they have decided, and they decided not to take KF down.

Their TOS gives them the lateral autonomy to decide what breaks the TOS, whether or not something violates their TOS, and how harsh of a punishment to enact.

Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach by msbarnett on Wednesday August 31, 2022 @04:54PM (#32668226)
> Ok then: they have decided, and they decided not to take KF down.

Right, so what exactly is your point here? "Who gets to decide?" -- They do -- "Ok, that's what they decided".

We're all aware of who decided and what they decided. Decisions come with consequences, among them being criticized for your decision making.

Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach by NoraCodes on Wednesday August 31, 2022 @01:13PM (#32665296)
Right. They get to decide to host these sites, and other people get to decide to organize legal economic actions against them, like boycotting. This seems like a normal and healthy part of a free market, no?
Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach by phillipcarter on Wednesday August 31, 2022 @11:56AM (#32663983)
The sky is blue, yes.