Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach
by fjordelectro on Wednesday August 31, 2022 @11:14AM
(#32663183)
The net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it. The push to platform everyone you don't like is accelerating radicalization. Instead of just existing as a small number of weirdos on mainstream platforms with millions of users, they are now building their own silos. Forced from internet infrastructure and payment networks, they are forced to build their own platforms and banks. This is happening now. The end game is an entirely segregated society. As the bar of allowed speech continues to zoom past opinions of large numbers of normal people, they too will be forced to move on to the alternative platforms.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach
by sealeck on Wednesday August 31, 2022 @11:51AM
(#32663877)
> Instead of just existing as a small number of weirdos on mainstream platforms with millions of users, they are now building their own silos.
This is _not_ about that - these people are building their own siloes; Cloudflare are hosting them. If Cloudflare stop providing services to them it will reduce their ability to host their own siloes.
Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach
by fjordelectro on Wednesday August 31, 2022 @12:09PM
(#32664243)
> If Cloudflare stop providing services to them it will reduce their ability to host their own siloes.
Yeah no it won't, well at least not in the long run. If anything good comes from all of this, it is that the internet by necessity will become more resilient. Unfortunately, enhanced resiliency will come at the cost of bifurcation. We told the exiled to just 'build your own platform' and 'build your own bank' but we didn't think that they would listen.
Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach
by sealeck on Monday September 05, 2022 @06:13PM
(#32730123)
Well they seem to be offline now, so I think it worked.
Re:Cloudflare's abuse policies and approach
by throwawayacc2 on Wednesday August 31, 2022 @11:54AM
(#32663920)
Is that a good thing?