I don’t know if there is some precedent in the Mughal tradition or whatever, but maybe it’s British. It has a very “dispensing the King’s Justice” feel to it. But that’s always kind of been the equity side of the courts. The common law courts were famous for rigid decision making. And I’d argue that it’s even more important in a pluralistic society like America where we don’t have a State Church or monarchy to serve as an agreed upon count of wisdom and justice.