Re:Why are D-sharp and E-flat considered to be two different...
by colomon on Sunday August 28, 2022 @11:44AM
(#32629287)
As far as I know it applies to both brass and woodwinds, though the degree of difficulty involved probably varies between types of instruments and also (at least on the woodwinds I'm familiar with) note to note.
Re:Why are D-sharp and E-flat considered to be two different...
by mr_tristan on Sunday August 28, 2022 @01:31PM
(#32630178)
A sax is really easy to control (or lose control) of the pitch. And in fact, many saxophonists will just shift various ranges around sharp or flat to suit their style (cough Phil Woods cough).
So basically, a woodwind like a sax will tune a few notes with a piano or whatever, but it's really up to the player to keep playing in tune. I would not even bother trying to autotune or use post-processing; it'll just sound weird.
This is also how you can get a room full of student musicians "tuned" but it still sounds like a disaster.
Re:Why are D-sharp and E-flat considered to be two different...
by tengwar2 on Tuesday August 30, 2022 @04:27PM
(#32654629)
If you listen to the start of Acker Bilk's "Stranger on the Shore", you can hear him bending the notes deliberately.
Re:Why are D-sharp and E-flat considered to be two different...
by palimpsests on Sunday August 28, 2022 @12:16PM
(#32629533)
retuning via tape velocity modulation would be easiest if the instrument in question was consistently out of tune with the rest of the band - like if the sax was always 15 cents flat relative to the harmonic structure.
usually that’s not the case though. typically it’s individual notes. much harder to precisely and accurately modulate tape velocity (especially by hand).
(1) Example: "get up an get out" by Iggy Pop. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1ld5jG3f-M