Re:Art is Fundamentally Social (2021)
by dudeguy3301 on Saturday August 27, 2022 @07:45PM
(#32624377)
yesyes, both good responses. i suppose i was focusing on a type of art prevalent in classism. many types of art have existed for all peoples through out history. we call cave paintings 'art' but did those peoples who painted them have that conception? most likely not. although a deep generalization has threaded every human culture's expressions of art, there is always variation. indeed art has been for the people in many cultures and for a very very long time. i suppose i was more focused on the whole 20th century, 21st century, computer part of the article, which in fact i didnt really dive into at all.
> the reproducibility of art in a capitalist industry brought art to the 'people'.
The Japanese were woodblock printing art for the masses since the 17th century. Woodblock printing itself is much older.