Re:Ghana bans a Delta Boeing 767 (yes, just one)
by prmph on Saturday August 27, 2022 @09:06AM
(#32618509)
> Ghanians?
Good that you called for possible correction here. It's "Ghanaians", not "Ghanians". Being Ghanaian myself, the spelling is one way I can tell if an article about Ghana has done its homework and is more likely to be accurate.
Re:Ghana bans a Delta Boeing 767 (yes, just one)
by jhugo on Saturday August 27, 2022 @07:37AM
(#32617906)
Delta would probably argue that they schedule their older frames on this route because of lower yield [0]. And you're right — political toy-spitting is one way to try to influence the decision away from the pure economics of the route. It worked with BA, it might work with Delta too.
[0] Older frames aren't necessarily less reliable — these issues could have happened to a brand new frame — and if maintained properly they are certainly not less safe. But they can be more economical in some ways (they're probably paid off), and higher-yielding destinations will reject the older frames since competitors run new aircraft on the same routes. There's not much competition on JFK-ACC.
Doesn't even have to be about safety, but respect. Transatlantic flights that turn back is a huge inconvenience, and adds probably a day of lost time for passengers in total. Perhaps the Ghanians(?) suspect they get a problematic aircraft because of racism or that they are not considered as important as a typical business shuttle to Zurich or London? It may seem weird to westerners, but smaller countries don't always have more "sophisticated" political tools like diplomatic backdoor channels.