tools used for reasons outside of work may be perceived as good tools for work;
and tools used professionally are sometimes considered to be good for use for personal reasons.
tl;dr it doesn't need to be true always, only sometimes, which it is
someone hav[ing] used a tool for personal reasons and may recommend it as a good tool for work is not enough to justify spending on those personal use cases
I am sharing that I have an equal and opposite opinion, which is that the someone having used a tool for personal reasons and may recommend it as a good tool for work sometimes IS enough to justify spending on those personal use cases
You are right that data can inform the decision, of course, keeping in mind that the benefits include intangibles like goodwill, which goes further in the techie community than in a layman community imo
People who are used to slack will pressure their boss to buy slack for work.
The slack company will just see a boss reaching out and buying. They will not relate it to the fact that it's the employees requesting it.
Bosses want to use microsoft teams, because it's included in the company's subscription. They accept to use slack because of the employees.
But if the new employees will not even know slack exists… they will not be asking for it.