Re:USPTO to add surcharge on non-DOCX patent applications in...
by CobrastanJorji on Friday August 26, 2022 @06:42PM
(#32613590)
One of the many things that I found tempting about working for the U.S. Digital Service was that, while the GS-15 pay grade is definitely way less than I'd make in the private sector, my spouse's family is military/government and the difference between "hippy programming thingy" and "has a GS-15/O-6 job" would've been night and day. The one puts me in a pile of stereotypes, but the other says "oh, he's basically the bureaucratic equivalent of a Captain, that's very respectable."
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:USPTO to add surcharge on non-DOCX patent applications in...
by ceeplusplus on Friday August 26, 2022 @06:43PM
(#32613598)
Different circles I guess. While my spouse's family considers government jobs to be stable and somewhat respectable, there is a lot more respect for FAANG and other high paying jobs. One is respectable, the other is prestigious.
Re:USPTO to add surcharge on non-DOCX patent applications in...
by macinjosh on Saturday August 27, 2022 @09:43AM
(#32618908)
Government work is not respectable.
Re:USPTO to add surcharge on non-DOCX patent applications in...
by Jcowell on Saturday August 27, 2022 @03:45PM
(#32622459)
Park conservation work is hella respectable
Re:USPTO to add surcharge on non-DOCX patent applications in...
by jcla1 on Saturday August 27, 2022 @04:44AM
(#32617085)
To clarify, I guess you mean "Captain in the navy", equivalent to a Colonel in other branches. A captain in the army is O-3.
Re:USPTO to add surcharge on non-DOCX patent applications in...
by macinjosh on Saturday August 27, 2022 @09:42AM
(#32618901)
That’s all perspective. Many people who realize you work the government will see you as a do nothing bureaucratic leech and for most government employees that is the correct assumption.