Mudge's redacted Twitter whistleblower disclosure [pdf]

Re:Mudge's redacted Twitter whistleblower disclosure [pdf] by cbdc_watcher on Friday August 26, 2022 @02:17AM (#32603909)

Maybe some gov agencies have the kind of culture that is biased toward a dry and austere communication style such as that typically found in papers coming out of regulatory agencies (and ones presented to them), but I assure you it is not a issue of logic; it's an issue of cultural preference. Trying to argue that a certain communication style is more productive in a certain context is again a cultural bias (not of your opinion but of theirs)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mudge's redacted Twitter whistleblower disclosure [pdf] by maxbond on Friday August 26, 2022 @03:55AM (#32604422)

I think we're just having different conversations here.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mudge's redacted Twitter whistleblower disclosure [pdf] by cbdc_watcher on Friday August 26, 2022 @05:18AM (#32604978)

you're saying it was sent to the regulators but it was written as a blog post for popular consumption. I'm countering by saying that whether the regulators are communicated with using a dry, austere style or a theatrical one fit for a blog post should not change the outcome, unless the regulators are culturally biased (toward the dry style) and therefore the sender chose to hit two birds with one stone )both the regulators and blog readers as audience).... that is unless the regulators are culturally biased

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mudge's redacted Twitter whistleblower disclosure [pdf] by aaaaaaaaata on Friday August 26, 2022 @09:55AM (#32607565)

Yes — why not achieve the most pressure from as many angles as possible, while telling the truth, just in a civilian-approachable way (as is customary in hacktivist circles).

[ Parent | on HN ]