Re:We compiled a library of realistic engineering take-home ...
by alexyang21 on Thursday August 25, 2022 @04:37PM
(#32599640)
How would a take-home compare to a hybrid format? For example, if you were given a 1-hour take-home followed by a live session asking about your thought process and
then pairing to extend what you previously worked on.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:We compiled a library of realistic engineering take-home ...
by anchochilis on Thursday August 25, 2022 @05:35PM
(#32600240)
I think a hybrid format is the right way to do take-homes. The candidate is less likely to resent the time invested in the take-home if they have a chance to discuss or "show off" their work. It also gives candidates who have less free time to complete a polished solution the chance to say "if I had more time, I would [add tests, optimize this function, ...]>"
I still struggle with the "observer effect" during live extension exercises, but it's less pronounced than when starting with a problem from scratch. If I prepare a high quality solution in advance and do well in technical discussions, that's usually enough to offset any fumbling around during the live programming session due to interview jitters.