News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The end of the manual transmission is near? by bambax on Thursday August 25, 2022 @09:01AM (#32593146)
Well no... that's my point! A political statement is not fashion. If one plants a political flag in their garden in support of a presidential candidate, that's not fashion, that's politics.

If people decide to broadcast their opinions about the world using cars, they certainly can; but I don't think that kind of behavior can be called "fashion". Ideology, maybe.

Re:The end of the manual transmission is near? by Retric on Thursday August 25, 2022 @09:41AM (#32593582)
Fashion: “social standing or prominence especially as signalized by dress or conduct” https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fashion

Political affiliation is definitely part of social standing and the degree to which such signaling impacts how people talk, dress, and what they buy is very much fashion.

Re:The end of the manual transmission is near? by randomdata on Thursday August 25, 2022 @11:40AM (#32595240)
Regionality in fashion is significant, clothing included, but in this part of the world trucks are definitely fashion. People largely drive trucks because they like the way they look in them, not because they have some secret political statement that nobody is picking up on.

As you venture out into the world you will also find trucks that are clear political statements. You might be right that an individual cannot own a truck for both fashion and political reasons (although I'm not sure I agree), but just because some people use trucks for political statements does not mean all trucks are political statements. Some trucks can be used for fashion without crossing those who use them political statements.

Re:The end of the manual transmission is near? by woodruffw on Thursday August 25, 2022 @09:10AM (#32593233)
I think that's making too fine of a point. There are numerous aesthetic choices associated with political positions; variants of "military chic" amongst conservatives is one example.

I happen to think that most modern trucks look incredibly stupid, but that's because their design language isn't intended for me. It's intended for people who have different fashion tastes, tastes that approximate political positions that I don't hold. In other words: the truck itself isn't a direct political statement, ordinarily; it's an efficient means for signaling politics through fashion.

Re:The end of the manual transmission is near? by randomdata on Thursday August 25, 2022 @11:59AM (#32595601)
> It's intended for people who have different fashion tastes, tastes that approximate political positions that I don't hold.

As a Canadian living in the heart of supply management (i.e. state ownership of the means of production) country, where supplies are provided by the so named and literal Co-op (i.e. community ownership of the means of production), trucks are very popular. In part because they are useful tools in carrying out the business within that socialist system, but also because outsiders emulate to try and convey similar social standing.

If there is a political statement to be found in there, which may be a stretch, to me it would be that trucks = socialism. But when I look beyond my bubble, I'm left with the impression that trucks are, if anything, especially stateside, a statement at the compete opposite end of the spectrum.

What approximate political position do you believe is inbuilt into the design of modern trucks?