News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:An odd discovery on Spotify by thematrixturtle on Monday August 22, 2022 @10:53PM (#32560017)
That almost makes sense, except that the money is paid out to the artist, so if you're using a stolen bank account, it remains 'dirty' after the round-trip.

What you'd want to do is use the dirty money for the bots that drive up the revenue, and the clean account for the artist to collect the royalties. This way the artist has plausible deniability, and if the bank account paying for the bots gets busted, it doesn't matter, you can get a new one.

Re:An odd discovery on Spotify by caf on Tuesday August 23, 2022 @01:28AM (#32560773)
This is right - the whole point with money laundering is to have a legitimate business where extra money can come in, apparently from real but untraceable customers, that is really dirty money you control.
Re:An odd discovery on Spotify by thayne on Tuesday August 23, 2022 @12:45AM (#32560558)
Isn't that what the parent described?
Re:An odd discovery on Spotify by thematrixturtle on Tuesday August 23, 2022 @01:04AM (#32560652)
No, they suggested using stolen bank accounts to receive the artist royalties.
Re:An odd discovery on Spotify by afiori on Tuesday August 23, 2022 @02:22AM (#32561101)
I think they meant "stolen identities and legitimate bank account opened by the stolen identity"
Re:An odd discovery on Spotify by 2000UltraDeluxe on Tuesday August 23, 2022 @04:38AM (#32562072)
This. Same thing with Google Play apps and similar where you can get a clean payout and you can buy gift cards for cash.

Back in the days, it was done with SMS payments and "party lines" with per-minute payments.

Re:An odd discovery on Spotify by mekkkkkk on Tuesday August 23, 2022 @07:51AM (#32563446)
What you are saying is that the "artist" whose account the cleaned money goes to has to be in on it? I.e. no identity theft or bank account hijacking?