Re:Brian Kernighan adds Unicode support to Awk
by hgs3 on Saturday August 20, 2022 @08:40PM
(#32536386)
UTF-32 performance woes are exaggerated. UTF-8 decoding requires branching whereas UTF-32 does not and in terms of storage real world text does not consume much space.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Brian Kernighan adds Unicode support to Awk
by kzrdude on Sunday August 21, 2022 @04:16AM
(#32538304)
Utf32 has the BOM which adds complexity and at least a top level branch. Maybe it's not so bad in practice, just duplicated generated code.
But as an internal representation, some of it can be ignored by choice.