Re:“Quantum-Safe” Crypto Hacked by 10-Year-Old PC
by jabbany on Friday August 19, 2022 @06:14PM
(#32526615)
No idea, but I could imagine something where you have a period of time on the chain where both signature types are allowed, and people can just migrate their coins by transferring from the old wallet to one based on the new signature system. Then after a certain cutoff, the chain can phase out the old signature system entirely.
Of course this only works if the old system is just "weak" rather than "broken". There is no way to recover if the signature system is completely broken, but if ECDSA is broken then we have more to worry about than just Bitcoins.
Re:“Quantum-Safe” Crypto Hacked by 10-Year-Old PC
by Spooky23 on Friday August 19, 2022 @05:38PM
(#32526267)
Not only that, but bazillions of coins are dead. My 4 bitcoins that were lost to a hard drive failure a decade ago are gone, and “reanimating” them wouldn’t even be theft.
Re:“Quantum-Safe” Crypto Hacked by 10-Year-Old PC
by DoctorOetker on Friday August 19, 2022 @11:00PM
(#32528618)
would you mind pointing at those coins, perhaps even add relevant public key information if still known?
Other systems that use ECDSA don't have this problem because they rely on CAs and central authorities. For things like, say, the TLS PKI; if you miss the flag date to change ciphers you aren't forever locked out of your domain. Your site just goes down until you bother to upgrade your servers and rotate keys.
Is there any known/stated policy as to how to handle phasing out a signature algorithm in Bitcoin?