Re:FBI agent pleads guilty to wiping hard-drive containing e...
by generalizations on Friday August 19, 2022 @11:49AM
(#32522527)
Better would be the inverse of the consequences when the defendant erases evidence - you just assume the destroyed evidence was whatever is worst for the prosecution and best for the defence.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:FBI agent pleads guilty to wiping hard-drive containing e...
by AlbertCory on Friday August 19, 2022 @12:24PM
(#32523021)
If the defendant erases evidence, he gets prosecuted for that. I don't think "you just assume" is ever what happens in a criminal case. IANAL.
Re:FBI agent pleads guilty to wiping hard-drive containing e...
by torstenvl on Friday August 19, 2022 @01:20PM
(#32523732)
Some jurisdictions have an "adverse inference" instruction for exactly this situation. I'm partial to WV's (I may be biased).
https://pds.wv.gov/attorney-and-staff-resources/research-cen...