News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:See what JavaScript commands get injected through an in-a... by AlexandrB on Thursday August 18, 2022 @08:27PM (#32516414)
Tell that to Facebook and LinkedIn. I don't get the double standard. These practices should be illegal, full stop. Why is it ok for US companies to do the same kinds of things?
Re:See what JavaScript commands get injected through an in-a... by didericis on Thursday August 18, 2022 @09:06PM (#32516662)
It is not a double standard. There are already legal and cultural limitations in the US that have much more respect for user consent, user privacy and intellectual property than in China.

Any US company caught putting arbitrary keyloggers in products can and should be condemned. Companies still track large amounts of data and pull shady antics, but the big difference is there is a means of holding US companies to account if they violate privacy standards, not least of which is through uncensored condemnation and legal action. That is not possible in China.

More stringent privacy norms and protections in the US would be welcomed. That doesn’t mean the status quo is comparable to China.

Re:See what JavaScript commands get injected through an in-a... by wfme on Thursday August 18, 2022 @09:22PM (#32516746)
> the big difference is there is a means of holding US companies to account if they violate privacy standards

Have yet to see this in practice. What usually happens is a bunch of articles are written "condemning" their actions, they are fined some ridiculously small amount and then business continues as usual.

The most recent action that seems to have had a significant impact on how Facebook captures data is Apple's "Ask App Not to Track". This is not exactly a shining example of the how the US system protects users privacy as the action was taken by a company, not a regulator.

Re:See what JavaScript commands get injected through an in-a... by didericis on Friday August 19, 2022 @01:00AM (#32517683)
That is more than what happens in China, and the demand for better privacy practices in the US is allowed to persist, build, and find its way into legislation and business practices of competitors.

US companies and regulators do not have to be shining beacons of user privacy and protections to be better than a system with no boundary between the state and private companies, with no expectation of privacy, and with censorship of opinion that criticizes shortcomings of the state.