Re:Delphi still exists and is actively developed
by tdeck on Thursday August 18, 2022 @07:07PM
(#32515906)
I love using these RAD tools but I think part of what we're forgetting is how much lower the standards were (both visual and functional) for UIs back then. Sure you could throw together a professional UI in a lot less time, but part of that was that the definition of "professional" was "looks exactly the same as every other Windows application and uses the same 5 form elements". We've just come to expect more variety so the RAD approach doesn't take you as far these days.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Delphi still exists and is actively developed
by CRConrad on Sunday August 21, 2022 @07:36AM
(#32539182)
> I love using these RAD tools but I think part of what we're forgetting is how much lower the standards were (both visual and functional) for UIs back then.
They weren't lower then, they're lower now.
> Sure you could throw together a professional UI in a lot less time, but part of that was that the definition of "professional" was "looks exactly the same as every other Windows application and uses the same 5 form elements".
Yup. That's still the correct definition.
> We've just come to expect more variety so the RAD approach doesn't take you as far these days.
Yes, unfortunately users have been conditioned to expect myriad variations of something like Kai's Fucking "Power Tools". And most of them have even been deluded into thinking of that as a good thing. They're wrong.