News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tornado Cash and collateral damage by aftbit on Thursday August 18, 2022 @05:00PM (#32514831)
Leaving aside the legality for the moment, because it's complex, jurisdiction-dependent, and constantly in flux, "crypto transaction laundering" is not in and of itself unethical. It depends on what you are intending to conceal. The parallels to encrypted messaging are really quite strong IMO.

If you are trying to hide a purchase (with your own money) from your wife because you think she wouldn't approve, that's totally ethical (if a bit of a silly relationship tactic). Similar if you're trying to hide a donation to an unpopular politician or charity from your employer. If you're trying to hide a donation to a militant organization, it's much more ethically complex and depends on the goals and actions of the organization. If you're trying to hide the source of ill-gotten money, it's likely unethical.

Separately, while the tool might be "primarily" used for unethical things, that does not make the tool unethical itself. Again it is the actions of the users that determine this. Even if hypothetically 95% of Tor users are pedophiles and ransomware crackers, that does not invalidate the "legitimate" ethical use of the tool by the remaining 5%.

Re:Tornado Cash and collateral damage by threeseed on Thursday August 18, 2022 @05:12PM (#32514968)
It's unethical if the tool doesn't take reasonable steps to prevent unethical usage.

For example implementing KYC and AML processes.

Re:Tornado Cash and collateral damage by notch656a on Thursday August 18, 2022 @08:31PM (#32516442)
By your logic the road crew who build the interstate are unethical because they happily build roads knowing money launderers will use them, without taking the slightest precaution to stop them.