This doesn't need to break down to some formally correct logical statement. Simply look at the facts of each case, the goals of each party involved, the systems each party uses to legitimize its actions, and the resulting effects of each party pursuing their goals.
Edit: Did you delete your very nasty message accusing me and “my ilk” of being “beyond repair?” I guess that language really fits with the whole “defending neo-Nazis” schtick.
The comment has been flagged, so it's hidden unless you enable "show dead".
My man, you're OK with throwing nonviolent offenders in jail for speech. This is not a good look.
A sensible person can also see that "being on the losing side of an election" is not equivalent to "not having anything resembling an election."
I wouldn't even chalk these up to nuanced or detailed or subtle distinctions. These are basic, substantial differences that only a disgruntled WEIRD-worlder could struggle to detect.
There is quite a difference between critizing the "Verbotsgesetz" and literally spreading neo-nazi hate speech.
By imprisoning geriatrics and a guy who made some songs people didn't like the messaging of?
> ruling class wants to crush all dissent against ruling class.
I don't see the difference at all. These people are criticizing a sacred cow and the ruling class wants to crush that dissent.