News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: A simple zero-dependency in-memory key-value sto... by geoah on Wednesday August 17, 2022 @09:49AM (#32496336)
Have you benchmarked this against using a sync.Map based version by any chance? It would be really interesting to see what’s the performance difference.
Re:Show HN: A simple zero-dependency in-memory key-value sto... by tomaszsobota on Wednesday August 17, 2022 @10:00AM (#32496505)
That's a great idea, I'll try and do that! Also, thanks for dawning on me the existence of `sync.Map`, I tried looking for something native but somehow I missed this. I guess tbkv won't match the native code performance, but it's a great exercise nonetheless! :)
Re:Show HN: A simple zero-dependency in-memory key-value sto... by tomaszsobota on Wednesday August 17, 2022 @06:34PM (#32502609)
The difference is even more than I expected.

On my hardware, a simple Set->Get scenario takes TBKV 1500 ns/op where sync.Map takes only ~80 ns/op to perform the same task.

That's a 20x difference in duration :(

The benchmark code is already in master.