Re:American Airlines agrees to purchase Boom Supersonic Over...
by mikeryan on Tuesday August 16, 2022 @11:22AM
(#32484007)
Three hours from SF/LA to Hawaii would have a ton of takers at a premium price even at coach class. It makes that trip doable for a long weekend.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:American Airlines agrees to purchase Boom Supersonic Over...
by arcticbull on Tuesday August 16, 2022 @11:27AM
(#32484081)
At just under 5 it already is, I know a few people who do it. Hawaii is a bad example because its very much a leisure market. They can barely make business class work with recliners let alone a Concorde replacement. That’s why they put their worst business class on the route.
This will end up running LAX-JFK-LHR in my opinion.
Re:American Airlines agrees to purchase Boom Supersonic Over...
by jfk13 on Tuesday August 16, 2022 @11:38AM
(#32484255)
Would they be allowed to go supersonic for LAX-JFK?
Re:American Airlines agrees to purchase Boom Supersonic Over...
by krallja on Tuesday August 16, 2022 @11:41AM
(#32484309)
No, that route is over land.
Re:American Airlines agrees to purchase Boom Supersonic Over...
by arcticbull on Tuesday August 16, 2022 @01:14PM
(#32485820)
Ah yes, I should have said 'I see a potential market for faster premium air travel on both the LAX-JFK legs and the JFK-LHR legs within the range of the Boom plane' - you are of course correct that they would not be able to fly LAX-JFK supersonic.
Re:American Airlines agrees to purchase Boom Supersonic Over...
by wbl on Tuesday August 16, 2022 @04:47PM
(#32488696)
Between PA and LA there are not a lot of populated areas so strearing around them should be possible.
Re:American Airlines agrees to purchase Boom Supersonic Over...
by krallja on Thursday August 18, 2022 @10:32AM
(#32510190)
14 CFR Part 91.817, in essence, prohibits anyone from operating a civil aircraft at a true flight Mach number greater than 1 over land in the United States and from a certain distance off shore where a boom could reach U.S. shores.