News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Second-Order Thinking. Parent comment

Re:Second-Order Thinking by drewcoo on Monday August 15, 2022 @09:59AM (#32469780)
I think that's 3rd order, actually.

Why does this remind me of Abbot and Costello?

https://youtu.be/sShMA85pv8M?t=64

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Second-Order Thinking by omginternets on Monday August 15, 2022 @12:18PM (#32471594)
"If x, then y" is one implication, so that's first-order reasoning.

"If y, then z" is second-order reasoning.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Second-Order Thinking by Akronymus on Tuesday August 16, 2022 @04:20AM (#32480468)
Wouldn't "if x, then y because z" be second order?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Second-Order Thinking by omginternets on Saturday August 20, 2022 @05:12PM (#32535175)
As I see it, z is a different type than x and y. It’s the causal arrow linking x to y. The existence of a second causal arrow would make it second-order.
[ Parent | on HN ]