the first things skeptics should be skeptical about is skepticism itself: are they right in being skeptical about what they are skeptical about?
The first thing skeptics question are sentences which begin with
>> the first things skeptics should be skeptical about
from there I guess we just migrate up to talking shit about bloated blog posts where one dude mumbles his observations about deep thoughts.
If in their analysis, they come to the conclusion that they shouldn't be skeptical, does that make them the best skeptic or the worst?
Most people just won't bother, because cynicism and snark provide a better endorphin hit, and the internet has trained people to associate that feeling with likelihood of correctness (what Stephen Colbert called "truthiness" back in the day.)