Re:Three papers highlight results of record yield nuclear fu...
by rtpg on Monday August 15, 2022 @11:00AM
(#32470528)
I fail to see how the fact that other people might be willing to do this research changes the ethical propositions at play. You are responsible for your research! Especially when you know what it is going to be used for. Refusing to do the research yourself might not stop it, but you refusing loudly, and convincing a couple people around you to not do so, adds up over time!
You are of course correct that the best thing is to institutionally change things. But the institutional changes are usually pushed for due to actual public pressure.
Re:Three papers highlight results of record yield nuclear fu...
by dennis_jeeves1 on Monday August 15, 2022 @05:07PM
(#32475382)
>but you refusing loudly, and convincing a couple people around you to not do so, adds up over time!
No, it doesn't. But the time you convince someone (if you do), there are 5 more people that you now have to convince who weren't on the scene before.
Societies and the world do not run on personal choices. Sometimes personal choices matter and can have reverberations throughout society, but assuming society can function on an accumulation of personal choices is a child's way of viewing the world. If you want to change something you find disagreeable, influence policy makers or somehow figure out how to change the academic landscape in America (which probably means you again need to influence policy makers). Otherwise, you'll keep finding more scientists making the "personal choice" to develop weapons for uncle sam.