News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Copyright infringement in AI art by revicon on Monday August 15, 2022 @01:58AM (#32466323)
Agreed, per the article “ style and a ‘look and feel’ are not copyrightable”
Re:Copyright infringement in AI art by Hemospectrum on Monday August 15, 2022 @02:08AM (#32466376)
I wonder if they can be trademarked. If not now, maybe later.
Re:Copyright infringement in AI art by surfacedetail on Monday August 15, 2022 @05:27AM (#32467549)
It's more difficult to trademark stuff like style, there are certain rules of what can be trademarked; long story short, non-graphical representations need to be clear, precise, self-contained, easily accessible, intelligible, durable and objective.

Trademark also gives a more limited protection in some ways.

Re:Copyright infringement in AI art by nl on Monday August 15, 2022 @02:47AM (#32466581)
Yes they probably can be trademarked.

But a big question is why? Trademarks are very expensive.

It makes sense for a company logo that was AI generated, but spending 100K+ for very limited protection of a piece of art seems questionable.

Re:Copyright infringement in AI art by verdverm on Monday August 15, 2022 @03:54AM (#32466933)
Trademarks are actually much cheaper than that, I paid a few thousand dollars for mine. The price range your quoting is more typical of patents
Re:Copyright infringement in AI art by clcaev on Monday August 15, 2022 @04:47PM (#32475148)
You can lose your trademark if you do not actively enforce violations. Hence, the full cost of a trademark should include its legal maintenance.
Re:Copyright infringement in AI art by verdverm on Monday August 15, 2022 @06:04PM (#32476059)
that is an unknown quantity which one cannot estimate
Re:Copyright infringement in AI art by nl on Monday August 15, 2022 @04:36AM (#32467192)
Was it international? And in how many categories?

It adds up very quickly.