Re:The relationship between Readability and Instapaper
by kennywinker on Wednesday November 16, 2011 @10:06PM
(#3246231)
The "Reader" button appears to be a fork of Readability (http://downloadsquad.switched.com/2010/06/08/think-safari-re...)
Also of note, the original Readability was actually "partly inspired by" instapaper (http://lab.arc90.com/2009/03/02/readability/)
Re:The relationship between Readability and Instapaper
by nikcub on Wednesday November 16, 2011 @11:33PM
(#3246398)
So I looked into all of these some time ago for an app that I use myself. The Safari fork of Readability is the best client implementation, while the best server-side implementation (by a mile) is Diffbot.
Out of the 50 sources I had (regular RSS updates, etc.) InstaPaper failed on far too many, either stripping important content or pictures and captions. Readability was only a bit better
I glued together an app that will pull in RSS, send each URL to diffbot, and then collate the output into a reader that I use. Never thought of releasing it as an app, I just use it myself.
Re:The relationship between Readability and Instapaper
by admp on Thursday November 17, 2011 @04:58PM
(#3249410)
Thanks for introducing me to Diffbot.
From your comment I expected it to be an open source implementation, but a high-quality SaaS with 50,000 API calls/mo on the free plan is still pretty damn good.
Re:The relationship between Readability and Instapaper
by tszming on Thursday November 17, 2011 @04:42AM
(#3247069)
Readability's code is a little bit old (2009), but seems no other better (opensource) alternatives...
And thanks for suggesting Diffbot, will try later.
Re:The relationship between Readability and Instapaper
by albertogh on Thursday November 17, 2011 @07:20AM
(#3247387)
C implementation and Python bindings, opensourced one hour ago https://github.com/fiam/readable
(However, I do believe the "Safari Reader" feature of iOS 5 and Safari 5 does use Readability to extract the contents.)