Or, in this case, the other 90000%.

This result does not bring us any nearer to civil energy production via fusion.

Good old fusion! Under such pressure. Does JWST have to result in a commercial application?

I think the general hostility is a reaction to the hype that "this breakthrough means we're closer to an infinite source of cheap, clean energy."

It clearly does not. I can understand the researchers feeling unable to tell the press, "Look, this is just basic research. Like the JWST." It might lead to a massive reaction that "well, then you have to just get in line for those basic research dollars, instead of being a top-priority thing we throw money at."

All those research dollars they'd be giving up!

The JWST cost about 3 times as much as the NIF. The annual budget for the NIF is about the cost of 6 F-35s, which the US is acquiring 152 of in FY2022. It's not getting top-priority money.

OK, I don't think comparing research to the defense budget is at all useful, but comparing JWST research to fusion research IS. So I'll stand corrected on US money.

However, ITER is a global effort, so it isn't just the US budgets we have to consider, right?