News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Calling Git a blockchain to rebrand bad tech by ricochet11 on Friday August 12, 2022 @08:11AM (#32437292)
85% of email is spam[1], but the remaining 15% is really useful and helps run the world.

same in everything: probably 85% of songs i don't like, 10% i'll listen to, 5% is amazing.

85% of crypto is nonsense, 10% is interesting, 5% transformative.

i find it a useful mental model to not be annoyed at everything i encounter. if theres tons of people saying taylor swift is great theres probably one song im gonna like. apply it to crypto too.

[1] https://donotpay.com/learn/spam-accounts-for-approximately-p...

Re:Calling Git a blockchain to rebrand bad tech by chaosite on Friday August 12, 2022 @08:30AM (#32437514)
The thing about crypto is that 50% of crypto is outright scams, 30% is nonsense, 15% is interesting academically but completely useless, and 5% is transformative in a very narrow particular set of circumstances that very few people actually have.

And I'm being generous.

Re:Calling Git a blockchain to rebrand bad tech by foodjinn on Friday August 12, 2022 @10:07AM (#32438867)
You are describing the google app store as well.
Re:Calling Git a blockchain to rebrand bad tech by chaosite on Friday August 12, 2022 @12:10PM (#32440600)
The Google app store has spam and not spam. Crypto only has spam.
Re:Calling Git a blockchain to rebrand bad tech by ly3xqhl8g9 on Friday August 12, 2022 @09:41AM (#32438496)
A perfunctory search shows there are over 20,000* cryptocurrencies in 2022. Saying that 3,000 (15%) are interesting|transformative is a bit of a stretch, especially given that over 19,990 of cryptocurrencies are in complete obscurity for the general public: if a coin is interesting|transformative in a forest with no one to hodl it, how interesting/transformative is it really? Sturgeon's law should probably be amended with "90% percent of Sturgeon's law examples are crud".

* "As of July 2022, there are 20,268 cryptocurrencies in existence. However, not all cryptocurrencies are active or valuable. Discounting many “dead” cryptos leaves only around 10,953 active cryptocurrencies." [1] — 15% of active cryptocurrencies in 2022 would be ~1,643, the point still stands.

[1] https://explodingtopics.com/blog/number-of-cryptocurrencies

Re:Calling Git a blockchain to rebrand bad tech by Communitivity on Friday August 12, 2022 @08:24AM (#32437439)
I think those are great examples of the Pareto Principle [1]. It says 80% of the results come from 20% of the causes. Your examples could be generalized to an extension principle: 30% of the consequences come from 15% of the causes, and 50% come from a separate 5% of the causes.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_principle

Re:Calling Git a blockchain to rebrand bad tech by ly3xqhl8g9 on Friday August 12, 2022 @09:58AM (#32438747)
They are applying Sturgeon's law [1] ("ninety-percent of everything is crud"), not Pareto, common misconception.

Pareto would be that 80% of all crypto transactions are done by 20% of all the cryptocurrencies (given 10,953 active cryptos, that would be 2,190), which also doesn't stand since ~99% of all crypto transactions are done by the top 10 cryptos (BTC, ETH, etc.), textbook oligopoly [2].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturgeon%27s_law

[2] https://coinmarketcap.com/charts https://www.statista.com/statistics/1269302/crypto-market-sh...

Re:Calling Git a blockchain to rebrand bad tech by knorker on Friday August 12, 2022 @10:14AM (#32438985)
There's 20'000 cryptocurrencies, and zero actual use cases outside of crimes like tax evasion, money laundering, and buying illegal things. So your percentages are a bit off, and should be more like 0.

I wouldn't even classify buying illegal drugs on the internet, which is the most moral of all cryptocurrency use cases, as "transformative".