My guess is that it doesn’t work in Canada because Kobo was a Canadian company before it was acquired and because Kobo’s owner used to own Overdrive (before it sold it to private equity a few years ago), but I could be wrong.
Obviously, if a device doesn’t work with the services you engage with, it’s probably not the service for you. But since Kindle does work with many, many library systems (and its arrangements with libraries predates Kobo’s existence), I think that’s more regional edge case and not a blanket reason to use one over the other, which is what OP was saying.
Meanwhile Amazon has been constantly messing with their proprietary format, DRM etc. Any book bought outside their store also almost always needs conversion too.
LOL, you think this is an _edge_ case? Feels pretty central from where me and the rest of the world are sitting...
I’m not going to pretend that’s the same for everyone, but I’m equally not going to pretend every person who has an e-reader is constantly getting stuff from the public library.
PS: Yeah that wouldn't work for books with DRM. So might be its the problem.
* Also works in lots of countries
* Great iOS and Android apps
* Well-priced devices, and no ads to remove
* Great hacking community (even complete replacement software) and DeDRM support
* Insanely robust library that has never let me down
* Ability to easily side-load content without needing a send-to feature (plug it in and drag/drop, or use Calibre)
* No Audible, but (a) it's an ereader not an audio player (it does actually do mp3s though) and (b) Kobo have an audiobook store
So all in all, the Kobo has worse audiobooks but better hacking and side-loading. Even if you prefer Kindle over Kobo, it is clearly not second-rate. And as for the last comment about being tied into an ecosystem, that's purely an Amazon thing. Kobo don't require that kind of acquiescence.
I don't have to say, imply, of even think that Amazon is "second-rate" to make myself feel secure about my decision. If anything I had to choose any word, it would be "monopolistic" or "vendor lock-in". But don't get me wrong: if Kobo changed their practices such that those words did apply, I would happily move elsewhere. (Kindle and Kobo are by no means the only companies out there.)
I also have a Remarkable 2 and a Boox Note Air that are obviously much more hackable.
I’ve reviewed many Kobo devices over the years. I do find them second-rate compared to what you can get from the Kindle line. That's my honest opinion. That isn’t me feeling insecure about my decision (I am an e-reader enthusiast and have reviewed dozens of devices and have the money to buy whatever device I want. I think Sony made the best devices if I’m really being honest, and they shut down their storefront over a decade ago and barely sell any units now), it’s my personal opinion and I said “I’ve always seen it as” — I didn’t declare that as fact. You disagree, which is fine!
I’m glad we have a choice of things. I still stand by my opinion that if I’m going to be tied down into an ecosystem, I’d rather be tied down to the one with the most books. And where I live, that’s Amazon.
* Works in lots and lots of countries
* Great iOS and Android apps to supplement reading on Eink
* Well-priced devices, even if you pay to remove ads, that offer years and years of software support and are extremely durable/reliable
* Great hacking community and ability to use things like DeDRM to bring your purchases to other devices
* Insanely robust library that is far more consistent than other services.
* Ability to easily side-load other content via the Send to Kindle feature
* Audible integration/sync/discounts
If you prefer Kobo, that’s fine. But I’ve always seen it as the second-rate alternative owned by the second-rate Amazon (Rakuten). If I’m going to get tied into any ecosystem, I’d prefer for it to be the biggest/most active. But that’s just me.
Edit: formatting