Descriptors Are Hard

Re:Descriptors Are Hard by netmare on Thursday August 11, 2022 @05:22AM (#32423321)

You all jest, but I'd kill for curated tags on HN. There's a lot of content here I don't really care about and it's steadily growing larger. Nothing wrong with the site, just personal preferences.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Descriptors Are Hard by elcapitan on Thursday August 11, 2022 @05:49AM (#32423499)

I wouldn't kill, but probably pay for an app that builds that on top of HN.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Descriptors Are Hard by dotancohen on Thursday August 11, 2022 @06:17AM (#32423660)

I wouldn't hand-curate the tags, but parsing a well-commented HN discussion, or the fine article under discussion, might lead to hints. For instance, given a Title term "Matrix", one might parse for "movie", "mathematics", "transformation", "neo", "algebra", "agent smith" and discover to which tag "matrix-movie" or "matrix-math" the discussion should be assigned.

Adding a UI that presents the tags in the Algolia search might be the difficult-to-get-right part.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Descriptors Are Hard by elcapitan on Thursday August 11, 2022 @06:40AM (#32423798)

I guess classification via combination of article and comments shouldn't be too hard (at least in my imagination). I would like to subscribe to tag-based RSS feeds then, ideally.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Descriptors Are Hard by jonatron on Thursday August 11, 2022 @07:06AM (#32423973)

Did you just invent subreddits?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Descriptors Are Hard by elcapitan on Thursday August 11, 2022 @07:28AM (#32424126)

No, why? I'm talking of automatic classification with multiple tags per post on top of a random mix of topics as we have it here.

[ Parent | on HN ]