Re:'Too many employees, but few work': Pichai, Zuckerberg so...
by fcatalan on Wednesday August 10, 2022 @07:16PM
(#32419661)
Dead weight would be people doing nothing. After those come the negative contributors: they do stuff but is all politicking and scheming, or just waste others time. Doing strictly what you are really paid for is bad now?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:'Too many employees, but few work': Pichai, Zuckerberg so...
by toomuchtodo on Wednesday August 10, 2022 @07:20PM
(#32419695)
“Enough” is not in the vocabulary of corporate vampires. Doing your job to the requirements should be acceptable, and that only works if your org is run by empathetic, reasonable leadership, you don’t tolerate the abuse of being squeezed, or you have a union. If the bar is never enough, you’re being gaslit, and that’s psychological abuse.
Re:'Too many employees, but few work': Pichai, Zuckerberg so...
by ravenstine on Wednesday August 10, 2022 @08:35PM
(#32420202)
That's exactly why most performance reviews are a scam. "Always room for improvement."
Re:'Too many employees, but few work': Pichai, Zuckerberg so...
by kelnos on Wednesday August 10, 2022 @07:25PM
(#32419739)
And I think that's exactly the original commenter's point: if the company he works for ever decides that "enough" isn't sufficient to satisfy his boss, he's he'll move on.
Re:'Too many employees, but few work': Pichai, Zuckerberg so...
by Spooky23 on Wednesday August 10, 2022 @07:43PM
(#32419877)
Working to rule is the first labor action unions start doing ahead of a strike.
If you want to do piecework/hourly work, you should be a contractor.