News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:2012 Will Be The Year NFC Breaks Big--Just Not In The U.S. by icebraining on Tuesday November 15, 2011 @09:05PM (#3241369)
What's exactly the difference between NFC and RFID? The NFC Forum FAQ isn't very clear.

Here in Portugal (and AFAIK in multiple European countries) we use contactless cards for public transportation, but that's about it; payments are still done with debit cards or cash.

Re:2012 Will Be The Year NFC Breaks Big--Just Not In The U.S. by oconnore on Tuesday November 15, 2011 @09:08PM (#3241387)
Basically the 'card' is in your phone, which has a battery and a CPU, so it can secure the communication of your identity which is tied to your bank information.

The radio frequency is identical.

Re:2012 Will Be The Year NFC Breaks Big--Just Not In The U.S. by icebraining on Tuesday November 15, 2011 @10:51PM (#3241655)
Yeah, but in the article they talk about the Octopus, which is a real card instead of a phone, as an NFC device.
Re:2012 Will Be The Year NFC Breaks Big--Just Not In The U.S. by lemming on Wednesday November 16, 2011 @01:32AM (#3242111)
They're basically the same thing with different ranges. NFC has a range of about 4cm, RFID goes up to a couple of metres I think. NFC is generally used when you want to make sure someone gets really close, which is generally the case with payments. You don't want someone able to interact with your credit card from several metres away without you knowing about it.
Re:2012 Will Be The Year NFC Breaks Big--Just Not In The U.S. by mike-cardwell on Wednesday November 16, 2011 @08:14AM (#3242960)
Presumably, just getting close to the card is not enough to initiate a payment? Most tables/desks are less than 4cm thick...
Re:2012 Will Be The Year NFC Breaks Big--Just Not In The U.S. by lemming on Friday November 18, 2011 @08:23PM (#3254270)
No, it's not sufficient (you'd need something pretending to be a terminal) but it is necessary which makes it much harder with NFC than RFID.