News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Correcting the Record on Meta’s Involvement in Nebraska Case by kelseyfrog on Wednesday August 10, 2022 @11:26AM (#32413555)
What we have now has the same legal-political texture the same as the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850. A state like California is compelled to assist states like Nebraska in the enactment of punishment of an act which is legal in California but which is illegal in Nebraska.

Make such assistance illegal so that Facebook doesn't have a choice in the matter. Facebook certainly has the political power[money] to successfully lobby for such a legislative change, but it doesn't have the will to do so.

Re:Correcting the Record on Meta’s Involvement in Nebraska Case by SpicyLemonZest on Wednesday August 10, 2022 @12:25PM (#32414576)
It's likely that the abortion in this case would have been illegal in California. It's hard to say for sure, because California prohibits abortion after medical viability rather than setting a strict week limit, but it happened at week 23 when many fetuses are viable.
Re:Correcting the Record on Meta’s Involvement in Nebraska Case by kelseyfrog on Wednesday August 10, 2022 @12:29PM (#32414635)
Mostly, for my own edification, but did similar ambiguities arise during the implementation of the Fugitive Slave Act? If so, how where they handled?
Re:Correcting the Record on Meta’s Involvement in Nebraska Case by SpicyLemonZest on Wednesday August 10, 2022 @01:07PM (#32415315)
I don't want to say "similar", because chattel slavery was uniquely bad, but even in areas that wouldn't enforce the Fugitive Slave Act forced prison labor was pretty common at the time. There was also the question of what should happen to people who conspire to violate the Fugitive Slave Act, although my understanding is that in practice it was impossible to get northern juries to convict them.