News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Perl? by scott_s on Tuesday November 15, 2011 @11:02AM (#3238644)
Sadly not true enough for many languages.

But I think equally true for the languages considered its successors: Ruby and Python.

Re:Why Perl? by berntb on Tuesday November 15, 2011 @12:18PM (#3239051)
From what I've seen of at least Python, it can't really touch CPAN (yet?). It is not the same width of neither modules nor infrastructure (CPAN Testers, etc.).

And the lack of code blocks irritates the life out of me. But I get why it is a common education language, like Pascal in its days.

Edit: Mithaldu wrote this up well.

Re:Why Perl? by scott_s on Tuesday November 15, 2011 @01:04PM (#3239285)
I was responding directly to the "loved" part, but now I realize that was not clear. For the record, I think everything but CPAN applies to Ruby and Python. And your personal irritations are not really relevant to people who use it, just as my personal irritations with Perl are relevant to people who use (and maybe love) it.
Re:Why Perl? by berntb on Tuesday November 15, 2011 @07:23PM (#3241062)
Considering the amount of trolling you get when Perl is mentioned on e.g. HN, I'd say that some other language culture's love is boundless -- and a bit less than fully grown up...

Which also applies to that "great community" point. Shudder.